Skip to main content

The New Nomads


The New Nomads

The fusion of mobile phones and internet has blurred the distinction between the two and given rise to voice over internet telephony and mobile internet. The resulting culture of mobile communications has taken to the concept of the virtual office to a new level. The culture of self employment gave rise to the explosion of modular space/service flexible business centres during the 1990's. However mobile internet is enabling a growing number of both employed and self employed people to do away with the office almost entirely. Consultants, sales people, designers and marketing executives are all using the portability of laptops and especially mini-laptops combined with mobile internet to work from cafes, literally on the go. This has the triple advantage of reducing costs (coffee is cheaper than monthly floor rental), ensuring employees are connected and exposed to surrounding trends and provides greater autonomy and mastery at the individual level.

Usually this new class of nomadic executives meet with one another and their office bound support staff/suppliers in a physical office on a regular basis. However, there is no reason to think that even these meetings will continue forever. The theory that getting together to maintain the construct of a corporate identity is important does not actually require such a meeting to take place in an corporate building. Why not simply meet in a coffee shop, hotel meeting room or similar environment? When companies want to get innovative or thoughtful they often go outside their normal place of business anyway. Indeed the freelancers are leading the way again, as more and more of them have no real physical office to speak of, beyond their mobile phone and laptop. Many, including myself, are meeting their clients, associates and suppliers (accountants, lawyers, consultants) at their offices or increasingly in coffee shops.

The shift to a nomadic culture of work is a radical one. Although it may free us from the strictures of office politics it places much greater pressure upon individuals to take responsibility for the structure and use of their own time, whilst also creating a more atomistic world. The nature of team work is likely to be far more adhoc, cross functional, project based and unstable as a result. Whilst the face to face connections that have historically been central to teams may become more limited by greater use of electronic meetings (Skype, Gizmo, Google Chat, etc.) and social networking (Facebook, LinkedIn, Yahoo Messenger, etc.). It also accords greater value to those people with strong networking and relationship skills, that Belbin would describe as resource investigators and Chris Rose would describe as Prospectors and Pioneers1. Whilst those who need stability and certainty are simply being left behind2

Freedom from routine for some may be liberating, but for others is likely to be a test of loneliness. Unless some means of providing a common bond that reaches beyond the extrinsic there will simply be fewer and fewer reasons to come together physically. In short, unless some meaning to common enterprise can be found above and beyond profit and bonuses the glue of the contemporary corporation will simply melt away. We are already seeing the beginnings of this process as companies open source their innovation. Effectively shifting large parts of the R & D function out to a nomadic tribe of freelancers and small firms existing, to all intents and purposes, on the internet.

This new nomdaism clearly requires a powerful blend of both relationship management skills and knowledge. However, what distinguishes nomadism from previous era's is the need to unite these two skill sets in one person. A person who may not be able to produce and deliver all the solutions, but who is able to cluster resources around innovative ideas, without the boundaries and resources of a corporate structure. Execution or delivery may well simply be oustourced, as, for example, Apple have done. Leadership thus becomes far more significant and simultaneously more complex. Gone are the days of having a pre-defined tribe of employees to lead. In the new world followers must be found, motivated and energised without the leverage of a salary contract, or the certainty of a large support department. The ability to provide a vision and effectively communicate across geographical, corporate and technological boundaries is becoming far more important to commerce than the ability process and administer data. The days of acquiring bureaucratic competence to climb the corporate ladder are gone. Success is at once both harder to define in objective terms, more fleeting and critically dependent upon a willingness to embrace the complexity that new nomadism brings.
1Rose, C., What Makes People Tick: The Hidden World of Settler, Prospectors and Pioneers, Leicester, UK: Matador, 2011.
2Taylor A. & Bronstone A., People, Place & Global Order: Foundations Of A Networked Political Economy, London: Routledge, 2019.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brexit or Bust...!

Brexit or Bust...! How did we get here? Philosophically the Anglo-American model of the State is quite different from the European State. Derived from Hobbes and Locke, it is rooted in a belief that man is, at core, evil and government exists primarily to protect us from ourselves. For the British relationships with the State are based upon a contract, whereby citizens grant authority to the government in exchange for guarantees to protect life, liberty and property. As Margaret Thatcher discovered, whilst trying to impose a new tax upon property, governments that are perceived to have failed to honour this contract swiftly pay the price. There can be no doubt that a large number of people perceive the EU as a threat to their liberty. This contrasts with the European model, derived from Rousseau, who believed that people are basically good, but corrupted by their environment. Thus the job of the European States is to manage and improve the society, with individual rights

Thinking Smaller...

When species move out of balance with their ecosystem nature seeks to punish and return to balance. From the enlightenment humans have assumed a role as masters of nature; so-called anthropocentric thinking. The separation of humans from the rest of nature is, of course, nonsensical. However, it has been key in our efforts (in the words of McBurney) to stuff all of the worlds ecology into economics and it won’t go! All of our worries about business and economics are really for nothing unless we hear and address what is a clear ecological wake up call to the fact that human behaviour is unsustainable. The idea that humans would destroy the earth was, as noted by Lovelock, always far less likely than we would destroy ourselves; sinking under the weight of our own hubris. Make no mistake, Coronavirus is simply part of a wider ecological alarm call. We either find a way to reset the way we live and organise ourselves, as a species, or we will simply see more extreme wea

Gunning For The President

 Gunning for the President The recent storming of Capitol Hill in Washington DC has caused widespread outrage.  However, amidst the condemnations of violence and shock that this could have happened in America, very little thought has been given to the relationships between leadership and motivation that give rise to such behaviour.  Trump supporters, just like the Brexit voters, support for LePenn in France and the AfD in Germany are united by a rejection of the global village, its multicultural values and liberal metropolitan leadership.  For many the convergence of technology and globalisation has outsourced their jobs and, through e-commerce, hollowed out their communities.  This is not to excuse violent behaviour, but simply labeling such views as crazy because of how they are expressed is to confuse the message with the medium and will not end well. The social and economic problems of both a digital economy and the pandemic have much in common.  Digital disruption challenges the l