Skip to main content

Surfing The Wave: How Technology Affects Strategy

The convergence of technology and globalisation is changing the world.  This blog provides a short description of how it is changing value creation.  Back in the days before the internet, strategy was about securing value creation within business processes, products and brands.  However, writing in 1990 Prahalad recognised that technological change requires a focus upon core competence to be able to adapt a business to markets evolution.  As the internet started to take hold Hammer realised that global connectivity would wipe whole layers of processes and people from organisations. To prove his point he cited how Ford sales people now entered purchase data such that they could reduce accounts payable staff by 75%!  This led to a noisy fad for so-called business process re-engineering (BPR). 

By the mid 1990s Arthur provided a prescient insight into the key characteristics which were re-shaping not just strategy, but economics itself.  He argued that wherever technology disrupts markets the law of diminishing returns no longer applies.  In fact  it becomes the law of increasing returns where those that are ahead move further ahead and those that are behind are left behind.  So-called network effects, or feedback loops lead to market equilibrium at a monopolistic state of competition (with 1-3 major players), rather than closer to perfect competition (many players within a market).  This takes place, he says, because of 'groove-in', which can be technological or social.   Technologically it captures the idea that to collaborate with technology we need to agree a technological standard and whomever controls that standard captures market lock in.  Controlling the VHS standard Sony dominated the video recorder market, or control of the .doc format continues to give Microsoft a monopolistic share of the office software market.  Social groove-in refers to the idea that it is hard to learn to use new technology and we are resistant to learning to use multiple technologies to do the same things.  This is why Facebook is so successful and MySpace and Friends Reunited were not.  Arthur argues that where this takes place management shifts from a search for order and optimisation to become a search to catch the next big wave.  In this world adaptability and critical thinking are what define success.

Evans and Wurster showed how technological change and forces of globalisation were converging to enable companies to achieve richness and reach.  Historically companies had to choose to sell in mass markets; competing for high volume and low margins, or go for niches where volumes were lower, but margins higher.  However, in the digital economy companies could have both.  As Amazon and eBay enabled global access the tiniest niches became viable and the days when companies could simply provide a limited range of mass market products ended.  This has opened up the whole world to smaller companies and simultaneously a world of choice has made the idea of simply marketing at consumers in specific geographic or sectoral markets redundant.

Wenger and Snyder showed how technology was blurring the boundaries of the firm with the development of communities of practice to source the power of global crowds and communities.  Mason then showed how such disruption is driving the marginal cost of distribution (and in some cases even production) close to zero.  Think how much it costs Apple to send you a track from iTunes. He then revealed how the Wiki model provides a template to use collaboration to remove capitalist logic from markets entirely.

Where this process is heading we can only guess at.  However, to survive in such a world requires a quite different approach to management than most companies are prepared for, or training their staff for.  Furthermore it requires a much deeper understanding of network dynamics and complexity than ever before.  The once strategic work of BPR based optimisation and search for order now offers, at best, tactical gains and may well be a strategic error is some businesses.

With colleagues from Europe and the North America I am now working to both capture the drivers behind the development of new markets and advise clients how to thrive in this emerging environment.

All references to writers are from Harvard Business Review, with the exception of Mason P. Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future London: Allen Lane, 2015

For more detail please buy my new book:


Popular posts from this blog

Digital Divorce

The unprecedented events arising from the Coronavirus pandemic has created a paradoxical situation. On the one hand, the need for social distancing is creating a huge swing towards digital delivery of products and services and the replacement of physical meetings with digital platforms. As such, this may well be a defining moment, where the digital economy assumes a driving role in the global economy. On the other hand, as the virus has taken hold national governments have quickly abandoned international cooperation and retreated into national isolation; slamming borders shut, refusing the sharing and export of medical resources and protecting national industries. Nowhere has this been more evident than Europe, with citizens trapped in countries other than their own, as flights are canceled and borders closed. On top of a continent wide trend towards reactionary and nationalistic politics this may well also set the tone for the future.

Going forward we face a world which is lik…

Thinking Smaller...

When species move out of balance with their ecosystem nature seeks to punish and return to balance. From the enlightenment humans have assumed a role as masters of nature; so-called anthropocentric thinking. The separation of humans from the rest of nature is, of course, nonsensical. However, it has been key in our efforts (in the words of McBurney) to stuff all of the worlds ecology into economics and it won’t go!
All of our worries about business and economics are really for nothing unless we hear and address what is a clear ecological wake up call to the fact that human behaviour is unsustainable. The idea that humans would destroy the earth was, as noted by Lovelock, always far less likely than we would destroy ourselves; sinking under the weight of our own hubris. Make no mistake, Coronavirus is simply part of a wider ecological alarm call.
We either find a way to reset the way we live and organise ourselves, as a species, or we will simply see more extreme weather, pande…

Innovation & Class War Goes Viral

The Covid-19 crisis, caused by the affluent elite, is hurting the poor unequally.

As the initial shock of the Coronavirus crisis is passing the blame game has started, with China and the US trading insults and the WHO caught in the middle…

Beyond high level political polemics, there is a growing realisation that this crisis is not affecting people equally and that the economic order of things is undergoing rapid change. Undoubtedly the speed of the global spread of the pandemic has been facilitated by a globe-trotting elite. They represent the living face of the globalization of both production and consumption that is as central to economic growth as it has been to ecological decline and viral spread. Reams of paper have been consumed describing the heroic efforts and risks taken by doctors and nurses, with belated recognition of the sacrifices made, for very low pay, by carers and delivery couriers. However, in our rush to buy loo roll we have forgotten that not everybody can affor…